Thanks!
| Party | Main Arguments | |-------|----------------| | | The film depicts an act that could be interpreted as “rape simulée” without clear, explicit consent cues, violating Article L.335‑2. The visual realism could encourage imitation. | | DorcelVision | The production includes a “pre‑scene consent contract” signed by all actors, a “safe word” system, and a disclaimer stating that the acts are simulated. The ban infringes on artistic freedom protected by Article 10 of the Convention européenne des droits de l'homme . | | Civil Society (AFVS) | The portrayal normalises sexual violence and may re‑victimise survivors; the “consent contract” is insufficient in a public broadcast context. | | Free‑Speech NGOs | The ban sets a dangerous precedent for content‑based censorship, especially for works that explore consensual BDSM themes. | club libertin 47 dorcelvision france interdit top
: Known for high production values, the film features "real hardcore reports" from active libertine spots. Thanks
or their VOD platform, which requires a subscription and age verification. | | DorcelVision | The production includes a